Showing posts with label TECHNOLOGY. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TECHNOLOGY. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

Government 'may have hacked IMF'

Hand on mouse, Science Photo Library A spear-phishing attack is likely to have kick started the breach

Related Stories

Hackers who broke into the International Monetary Fund's computer system may have been backed by a nation state, according to security experts.
They point to the sophisticated nature of the attack and the resources needed to develop it.
Malicious software, designed to steal confidential files, was installed on at least one IMF computer.
Although government involvement is widely suspected, the IMF has not released enough details to be sure.
Digital insider Based on the limited information made public, it appears that the attack came from a specific PC that had been deliberately infected.
Hacker software was likely to have been installed on it in what is known as a spear-phishing attack, which sees highly targeted scam e-mails sent to specific victims.
A memo circulated internally at the IMF reported that "suspicious file transfers" had been detected.
Tom Kellerman, a security expert who has worked for the IMF and now sits on the board of the International Cyber Security Protection Alliance told Reuters news agency that it was "a targeted attack" with code written specifically to give a nation state a "digital insider presence" on the IMF network.
Graham Titherington, a security analyst with research firm Ovum agreed with the nation state theory.
"Any attack that shows money, time and resources went on it points to a state attack. States and their intelligence agencies have far more resources than criminal gangs," he said.
The information held by the IMF would clearly be most valuable to a country, he added.
"It has masses of economic information from the performance of countries to the state of their balance sheets. For countries deciding where to invest it is invaluable," he said.
State-sponsored hacking has gained prominence in recent months.
"Google shifted the debate by going public on a hack attack believed to be by China," said Mr Titherington.
The Chinese government has denied involvement in the recent attack on Google's e-mail accounts.
The incident compromised the personal Gmail accounts of hundreds of top US officials, military personnel and journalists.
Google said that the campaign to obtain passwords originated in the Chinese city of Jinan and was aimed at monitoring e-mail.
According to Mark Darvill, director of security firm AEP Networks, many countries are involved in cyber espionage but China remained at the "forefront".
"China has recently set up a cyber terrorism unit which is very likely to be looking at opportunities rather than to stop attacks," he said.
Convenient excuse Not everyone is convinced that state-sponsored attacks or Advanced Persistent Threat (APTs) are the cause of the IMF hack.
Tal Be'ery, a web researcher at security firm Imperva said it could be a "convenient excuse".
"It is easier for organisations to hide under this excuse when really it is something lacking in their defences.
"We don't have enough credible information about the IMF attack. It needs to provide good evidence that it was a APT. It is just as likely to be a lone hacker acting out of curiosity," he said.
The most high profile state-sponsored attack to date remains the Stuxnet worm, which targeted Iran's nuclear facilities.
Experts believe the complex malicious code originated from either the Israeli or US governments.

Laser is produced by a living cell


Cell emitting laser light (M Gather) The single-cell lasers were less than 20 millionths of a metre across

Related Stories

A single living cell has been coaxed into producing laser light, researchers report in Nature Photonics.
The technique starts by engineering a cell that can produce a light-emitting protein that was first obtained from glowing jellyfish.
Flooding the resulting cells with weak blue light causes them to emit directed, green laser light.
The work may have applications in improved microscope imaging and light-based therapies.
Laser light differs from normal light in that it is of a narrow band of colours, with the light waves all oscillating together in synchrony.
Most modern forms use carefully engineered solid materials to produce lasers in everything from supermarket scanners to DVD players to industrial robots.
The new work, by Malte Gather and Seok Hyun Yun at the Wellman Center for Photomedicine at Massachusetts General Hospital in the US, marks the first time the phenomenon has been seen in a living system.
The pair used green fluorescent protein (GFP) as the laser's "gain medium", where light amplification takes place.
GFP is a well-studied molecule, first isolated from jellyfish, that has revolutionised biology by acting as a custom-made "torch" that can light up living systems on command.
In the new work, cells derived from human kidney cells were genetically engineered to produce GFP.
Bathed in light The cells were then placed one at a time between two tiny mirrors, just 20 millionths of a metre across, which acted as the "laser cavity" in which light could bounce many times through the cell.
Upon bathing the cell with blue light, it could be seen to emit directed and intense green laser light.
The cells remained alive throughout and after the process. The authors note in an accompanying interview in the journal that the living system is a "self-healing" laser; if the light-emitting proteins are destroyed in the process, the cell will simply produce more.
"In cellular sensing, we may be able to detect intracellular processes with unprecedented sensitivity," they said.
"For light-based therapeutics, diagnosis and imaging, people think about how to deliver emission from an external laser source deep into tissue. Now we can approach this problem in another way: by amplifying light in the tissue (itself)."

Nokia and Apple settle patent dispute

iPad, AFP/Ggetty Nokia claimed some technology in the iPad infringed its patents

Nokia and Apple have agreed a technology licensing agreement that ends the long-running legal dispute between the two firms.
"The agreement will result in settlement of all patent litigation between the companies," Nokia said.
Nokia sued Apple for patent infringements in 2009 and extended the action in December last year.
Apple had countersued, accusing Nokia of infringing its patents.
Nokia said Apple had agreed a one-off payment, the value of which was not disclosed, and ongoing royalties to use its technologies.
Apple said the deal covered both companies' patents.
Counter claims

"We are very pleased to have Apple join the growing number of Nokia licensees," said Nokia's chief executive Stephen Elop.
"This settlement demonstrates Nokia's industry-leading patent portfolio and enables us to focus on further licensing opportunities in the mobile communications market."
Apple said the two firms had agreed to "drop all of our current lawsuits and enter into a licence covering some of each other's patents, but not the majority of the innovations that make the iPhone unique".
"We're glad to put this behind us and get back to focusing on our respective businesses."
'Positive news' Nokia's various claims against Apple included alleged patent infringements of touch interfaces, caller ID, display illumination, and 3G and wi-fi technology.
Apple had also claimed that Nokia had infringed many of its patents.
Both sides had always denied each other's claims.
"This is the first positive news from Nokia for a long time. They can both focus on their businesses now, and the dispute was settled to Nokia's advantage," said Mikael Rautanen at research group Inderes in Helsinki.
At the end of last month, Nokia said it expected sales and profit margins for the current quarter to be well below its previous forecasts.
The company has been struggling to reposition itself in the rapidly-growing smartphone sector, where it is trying to make up ground lost to competitors such as Apple's iPhone and phones using Google's Android operating system.

Thursday, June 2, 2011

Viewpoint: Anthropology meets technology By Genevieve Bell Corporate anthropologist, Intel

A visitor plays with a tablet PC at the Intel booth during the Computex 2011 computer fair.  
Intel shows off its latest products at the Computex 2011 fair in Taipei
The first question anyone asks when they meet me is: "What does a corporate anthropologist do?"
I joined Intel, the US semiconductor giant, 12 years ago, at a time when the technology industry was experiencing the first wave of what we now call consumerisation.
By that, I mean PCs were moving from being a tool for the office into the home and becoming part of people's personal lives.
At that time, the question among tech companies was, could you get out ahead of that shift.
So Intel hired me and a number of other people like me to help it better understand human beings.
Over the years, the team has grown to include people of a variety of different stripes: anthropologists, sociologists, cognitive psychologists, industrial designers, interaction designers and human factors engineers.
And our role has evolved to thinking about a broader array of questions.
Part of this is educational - explaining to a technology company what happens after Moore's Law, in which technology gets progressively smaller, faster and cheaper.
But the job is mainly to help the people who design our products to better understand those who will use them.
That involves getting out into the office, into the field, and into people's homes to ask questions about where technology empowers them, where it frustrates them and to learn about the diversity of experiences they are having with technology around the world.
On the move One of my early projects tested the assumption that early adopters of technology in urban Asia would behave the same as in America or western Europe. And of course we found that they are very different.
Indonesia is a fantastic example of that today. The proportion of the country's online population using Facebook is one of the highest in the world.
Intel book at computex 2011 Tablets are the next evolution in consumer electronics
But because of the issues they have with the quality of broadband, the majority of people accessing the internet are doing it via their phones.
Back in 1998 when I started at Intel, computing was all about the PC. Flash forward 12 years and we are in a world where computing smarts are embedded in all sorts of things - and the interesting question is, what's next?
One place where we expect to see a lot more computing technology in the next few years is in cars.
There are nearly a billion of them on the planet and new cars today already have somewhere between 12 and 24 computer chips in them.
We've been in Singapore, Malaysia, China and Australia asking people to let us turn out the contents of their cars: front to back, glove compartment, doors, in between the seats, under the seats, boot (trunk) and everything.
We put it on a tarpaulin and photograph it, a little like an archaeological dig.
We want to get a better understanding of the role that content plays in their lives and where computing technology might intersect with that.
In Malaysia and Singapore, for example, we were surprised to find people kept "ang pow" packets (envelopes of money given at Chinese New Year and thought to be lucky) in their cars all year round.
In a sense, people there were using their cars to keep them socially safe, not just physically safe.
Ultimately, my team's role is about making sure the product development processes start from an understanding of what people care about when it comes to technology.
And that as an organisation, we are literally testing our silicon against that ideal at each and every step of the way.
The opinions expressed are those of the author and are not held by the BBC unless specifically stated. The material is for general information only and does not constitute investment, tax, legal or other form of advice. You should not rely on this information to make (or refrain from making) any decisions. Links to external sites are for information only and do not constitute endorsement. Always obtain independent, professional advice for your own particular situation.

China rejects Gmail spying claims

Google's logo Google said the cyber-spying campaign targeted Gmail accounts of US officials and journalists
China has rejected allegations of involvement in a cyber-spying campaign targeting the Google e-mail accounts of top US officials, military personnel and journalists.
A foreign ministry spokesman said it was "unacceptable" to blame China.
Google has not blamed the Chinese government directly, but says the hacking campaign originated in Jinan.
The US company said its security was not breached but indicated individuals' passwords were obtained through fraud.
Chinese political activists and officials in other Asian countries were also targeted, Google said.
Washington investigation It is extremely difficult for analysts to determine whether governments or individuals are responsible for such attacks, says the BBC's Adam Brookes in Washington.
But the fact that the victims were people with access to sensitive - even secret - information raises the possibility that this was cyber-espionage rather than cyber-crime, adds our correspondent.
However, Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Hong Lei told a news briefing: "Blaming these misdeeds on China is unacceptable.
"Hacking is an international problem and China is also a victim. The claims of so-called support for hacking are completely unfounded and have ulterior motives."
On Wednesday, Google said it had "detected and has disrupted" a campaign to take users' passwords and monitor their emails.
"We have notified victims and secured their accounts," said the company. "In addition, we have notified relevant government authorities."
The e-mail scam uses a practice known as "spear phishing" in which specific e-mail users are tricked into divulging their login credentials to a web page that resembles Google's Gmail web service (or which appears related to the target's work) but is in fact run by hackers.
Having obtained the user's e-mail login and password, the hackers then tell Gmail's service to forward incoming e-mail to another account set up by the hacker.
The White House said it was investigating the reports but did not believe official US government e-mail accounts had been breached.

Popular Posts